Comments on: Survival of the Dead http://www.commentarium.net/2010/03/survival-of-the-dead/ Talking about film and TV - with enthusiasm! Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:20:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jonas Kyratzes http://www.commentarium.net/2010/03/survival-of-the-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1733 Jonas Kyratzes Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:18:00 +0000 http://www.commentarium.net/?p=210#comment-1733 And this is true because... you say so? There were several scenes in the movie that easily refute your claims. And this is true because… you say so? There were several scenes in the movie that easily refute your claims.

]]> By: RomeroHasLostIt http://www.commentarium.net/2010/03/survival-of-the-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1730 RomeroHasLostIt Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:05:12 +0000 http://www.commentarium.net/?p=210#comment-1730 @ "In every other movie, Francisco (Stefano Colacitti) would be the cliché Latino stud; here we can see further layers under the machismo, and the character feels entirely real and likeable. The same goes for Tomboy (Athena Karkanis), who is a lot more than your standard-issue 'tough dyke' character" No, they're not. One dimensional cliches is EXACTLY what they are. @ “In every other movie, Francisco (Stefano Colacitti) would be the cliché Latino stud; here we can see further layers under the machismo, and the character feels entirely real and likeable. The same goes for Tomboy (Athena Karkanis), who is a lot more than your standard-issue ‘tough dyke’ character”

No, they’re not. One dimensional cliches is EXACTLY what they are.

]]>