The Royal Tenenbaums

by Jonas Kyratzes

The Royal Tenenbaums is better than Rushmore. That’s not saying much, but it is true. Somewhere in this mess of insufferable clichés and forced eccentricity are the sparks of talent that eventually led to The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. Despite all the postmodern nonsense, the stereotypical characters and the lack of connection to any kind of reality, there are moments when the film is actually good. Short moments, granted, but short moments are better than no moments.

Mostly, though, it’s insufferable bullshit.

The problem with the movie is that it’s a character-oriented story with no characters. Instead of characters, it has a cast of caricatures; few of them are likeable, and none of them are realistic in any sense of the word. Where it has potential to be touching, it destroys any real emotions by making its characters into jokes; where it has potential to be intelligent, it is simply too affected and too lazy to give any real depth.

Particularly offensive is the character of Margot Tenenbaum, played by Gwyneth Paltrow. Here we have someone who is supposedly an artist, a playwright – a genius, in fact. And yet all we see is a self-involved, pointlessly promiscuous “quirky” depressive with no vision, no passion and no real reason to be that way other than superficial “daddy issues.” One generally does have to wonder at the depiction of women, both here and in Rushmore, as entirely passive figures, either saints or sluts.

And let’s not even get into the weirdness that is Pagoda, Royal Tenenbaum’s handy Indian servant, who apparently has no life of his own.

The Royal Tenenbaums is simply too far removed from reality to be good. Not because of its subject matter, or even because of its aesthetics, but simply because it’s not about real people or real emotions. There are glimpses of reality in some scenes, especially the ones with Gene Hackman and Anjelica Houston, but to some degree that is simply because these two actors are fantastically skilled. (Though even if the characters were more realistic, it would take a very talented and perceptive writer to make these rich people’s problems interesting.)

When Wes Anderson makes movies that aren’t yelling “look at me! look at me! I’m so quirky!” all the time, and starts portraying some adult emotions, he can be a very good filmmaker. The Royal Tenenbaums, unfortunately, is not one of those movies.

Interesting links:

Rushmore

by Jonas Kyratzes

I’ve always intensely disliked the new wave of horror movies that gets categorized as “torture porn.” I do not enjoy seeing likeable characters be tortured, and if I wanted to watch dislikeable people abusing each other I’d watch Caprica.

Rushmore is the dramedy equivalent of torture porn, with a little less violence. It is the story of an arrogant little shit of a student step by step ruining the life of the female teacher he’s supposedly in love with while competing for her affections with an underused Bill Murray. And just like its protagonist, this movie is a smug little bastard-thing that never realizes that the woman everyone is competing over is a person. Oh, I’m sure the filmmakers thought that’s all in the movie’s subtext – only it’s not, because Rosemary Cross (played by the amazing Olivia Williams, who deserves better) remains a passive figure to be “won” by our protagonists. Protagonists who learn next to nothing and, in the case of Max Fischer, have nothing even remotely good about them.

I cannot believe that critics accused The Brothers Bloom – a movie so full of heart and beauty – of being smug, and didn’t trash this movie for the self-indulgent, incoherent nonsense that it is. Equally bizarre is the fact that critics accused the director’s masterpiece, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, of being mannered, when they celebrated the disastrous fakeness and pretentiousness of Rushmore.

Rarely in my life have I felt as much revulsion for a movie. (The other time was probably for Hotel Chevalier, a short film by the same director. But he still made Fantastic Mr. Fox and The Life Aquatic, so that balances things out a little.)

Interesting links:

Fantastic Mr. Fox

by Verena Kyratzes

The films of Wes Anderson don’t have it easy. Everyone loves them, at least as far a gross overgeneralizations go, but I don’t think many understand them. His movies are whimsical and funny, but all of them also have a deep, underlying seriousness, or even sadness. Rushmore, The Royal Tenenbaums and The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou. All movies that I deeply love, but also all movies that carry some deep sadness in them. But they’re not depressing. The Life Aquatic is one of the most inspiring movies ever made. A feel-good movie if I ever saw one.

But I digress. I was about to write about Fantastic Mr. Fox. The reason why I began this article in the way that I did is that I know why Mr. Fox didn’t have much financial success. It’s not because the movie isn’t beautiful. Or because the story doesn’t touch you. Or because the actors aren’t up to scratch, or maybe (to use a more shallow arument) because they aren’t “big” enough. No, that’s not the reason, because The Fantastic Mr. Fox has all that and more. It’s because no one knows what to make of this movie.

Continue reading